I don't get this. The SG-1 team shoot the Goa'uld with conventional bullets (at least I assume that is what they are shooting) and it takes several shots to knock one down because the bullets can't penetrate the Goa'uld armor. But after multiple bullet hits all over the armor when the Goa'uld finally fall their armor still looks flawless. Why do they eventually fall down if the armour looks like the bullets never penetrated?
Also, its not even like two bullets are made to hit the same place to finally penetrate. Why should bullets which hit at a different location each time finally penetrate? Is realism too much to ask for?
I'm guessing this lameness is the result of a limited special effects budget. But couldn't the Stargate producers have come up with a cheap way to show that the armor had been penetrated? They make the sparks show where the bullets hit. How about one of these ways to show why they fall?
do you think Apophis will stay dead after the series 7 ? i dont i think he will return and continue what Anubis is trying to do destroy earth but i reckon he will kill anubis and take control of what is anubisies
Posted by: ben post on March 9, 2004 05:46 AMin answer to the armour question there are multipule reasons for no armour destruction one the armour is very expensive to make and to damage one piece of armour would make it unuseable again two sg1 used armour piercing bullets as can be seen in early on series when the bullets had a highlighted red tip also quite often u see head shot being made but with so many jaffa warrios on screen at any time u would need a huge special effects budget not to mention a very gifted pyrotechnician to pull off such a feet and one only worthy of a film crew as is it takes a large budget to create the off world scenes we see every day and the weapons fire dont expect so much form a tv series
Posted by: james on April 5, 2007 06:50 AM